|
0 Points |
1 Point |
2 Points |
3 Points |
4 Points |
Total |
| Research |
Cannot understand presentation because there No apparent outside research. |
Information from at least one source apparent. |
Information from more than one source. |
Multiple sources cited. |
Multiple sources cited. Sources represent a variety of different perspectives. |
|
Discussion of Issues |
No discussion of issues. |
Discussion of issues incomplete or not logical. |
More than one issue explored logically. |
Most important issues explored logically. |
All important issues fully and logically explored from both a Pro and Con position. |
|
Support for Recommendation |
Opinion is not supported by facts. |
Attempt to support recommendation/ opinion with facts, but incomplete or not logical. |
All opinions logically supported by facts. |
All opinions supported by facts in depth. |
All opinions logically supported by facts in depth. Counter arguments against recommendation are addressed and refuted with evidence. |
|
Persuasiveness of Argument |
Argument is not persuasive or thought out. |
Argument is logical but not compelling. |
Solid argument. |
Argument is persuasive. |
Argument is very compelling. Could influence the opinion of a neutral party. |
|
Grammar |
Constant mistakes in grammar and spelling makes paper difficult to understand. |
Mistakes in grammar or spelling distract reader. |
Some errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling, but does not detract from the message. |
Very minor and insignificant errors. Style is easy to read. |
Grammar, punctuation, style is virtually flawless and interesting to read. |
|
Total Points |
|